Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
Neo and ergoCub split the comparable public fields. Reality Score and lifecycle are included where published, but missing specs do not count as losses. Public specs are sparse, so avoid over-reading the head-to-head.
Neo leads on
- Lifecycle
ergoCub leads on
- Reality Score
Specs
Spec
Neo
ergoCub
Lifecycle
Limited release
Prototype
Reality Score
60 / 100
63 / 100
Height
168 cm
150 cm
Weight
No sourceable public value for one side.
30 kg
No sourceable public value
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
25 kg
No sourceable public value
Runtime
No sourceable public value for one side.
4h
No sourceable public value
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
6.2 m/s
No sourceable public value
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
75
No sourceable public value
DoF (per hand)
No sourceable public value for one side.
25
No sourceable public value
Actuator
Tendon driven
Electric
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
Neo
ergoCub
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
Yes
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-07-09
2026-07-18
Source confidence
Source list published
high