Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
ergoCub and Neo split the comparable public fields. Reality Score and lifecycle are included where published, but missing specs do not count as losses. Public specs are sparse, so avoid over-reading the head-to-head.
ergoCub leads on
- Reality Score
Neo leads on
- Lifecycle
Specs
Spec
ergoCub
Neo
Lifecycle
Prototype
Limited release
Reality Score
63 / 100
60 / 100
Height
150 cm
168 cm
Weight
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
30 kg
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
25 kg
Runtime
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
4h
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
6.2 m/s
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
75
DoF (per hand)
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
25
Actuator
Electric
Tendon driven
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
ergoCub
Neo
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
Yes
No
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-07-18
2026-07-09
Source confidence
high
Source list published