Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
vs
Quick read
Neo leads on more comparable public fields than iCub. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
Neo leads on
- Weight
- DoF (total)
iCub leads on
- Reality Score
Specs
Spec
Neo
iCub
Lifecycle
Limited release
Limited release
Reality Score
60 / 100
70 / 100
Height
168 cm
105 cm
Weight
30 kg
33 kg
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
25 kg
No sourceable public value
Runtime
No sourceable public value for one side.
4h
No sourceable public value
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
6.2 m/s
No sourceable public value
DoF (total)
75
53
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
Tendon driven
Electric
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
Neo
iCub
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
Yes
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-05-17
2026-05-16
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published