Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
Neo leads on more comparable public fields than AgiBot Expedition A3. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
Neo leads on
- Lifecycle
- Reality Score
- Weight
AgiBot Expedition A3 leads on
- Runtime
Specs
Spec
Neo
AgiBot Expedition A3
Lifecycle
Limited release
Demo
Reality Score
60 / 100
49 / 100
Height
168 cm
173 cm
Weight
30 kg
55 kg
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
25 kg
No sourceable public value
Runtime
4h
10h
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
6.2 m/s
No sourceable public value
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
75
No sourceable public value
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
No sourceable public value for one side.
Tendon driven
No sourceable public value
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
Neo
AgiBot Expedition A3
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-05-17
2026-05-19
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published