Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
NAO leads on more comparable public fields than Apollo. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
NAO leads on
- Lifecycle
- Reality Score
- Weight
Apollo leads on
- Runtime
Specs
Spec
NAO
Apollo
Lifecycle
Limited release
Pilot
Reality Score
75 / 100
66 / 100
Height
57 cm
172 cm
Weight
5 kg
73 kg
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
25 kg
Runtime
1h
4h
Top speed
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
25
No sourceable public value
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
NAO
Apollo
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
Yes
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-05-16
2026-05-14
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published