Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
Booster T2 and ergoCub split the comparable public fields. Reality Score and lifecycle are included where published, but missing specs do not count as losses. Public specs are sparse, so avoid over-reading the head-to-head.
Booster T2 leads on
- Lifecycle
ergoCub leads on
- Reality Score
Specs
Spec
Booster T2
ergoCub
Lifecycle
Demo
Prototype
Reality Score
44 / 100
63 / 100
Height
140 cm
150 cm
Weight
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Payload
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Runtime
No sourceable public value for one side.
2h
No sourceable public value
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
2 m/s
No sourceable public value
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
31
No sourceable public value
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
Booster T2
ergoCub
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
Yes
Teleop disclosure
No
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-07-18
2026-07-18
Source confidence
high
high