Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
XPENG Iron leads on more comparable public fields than PUDU D9. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
XPENG Iron leads on
- Lifecycle
- DoF (total)
PUDU D9 leads on
- Reality Score
Specs
Spec
XPENG Iron
PUDU D9
Lifecycle
Demo
Prototype
Reality Score
40 / 100
51 / 100
Height
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
170 cm
Weight
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
65 kg
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
20 kg
Runtime
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
2 m/s
DoF (total)
82
42
DoF (per hand)
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
11
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Evidence
Evidence
XPENG Iron
PUDU D9
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
No
No
Last reviewed
2026-06-03
2026-06-06
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published