Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
Walker S2 leads on more comparable public fields than MATRIX-3. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
MATRIX-3 leads on
- Weight
- DoF (per hand)
Walker S2 leads on
- Lifecycle
- Reality Score
- Top speed
Specs
Spec
MATRIX-3
Walker S2
Lifecycle
Demo
Limited release
Reality Score
50 / 100
56 / 100
Height
170 cm
176 cm
Weight
65 kg
70 kg
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
15 kg
Runtime
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Top speed
1.1 m/s
2 m/s
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
52
DoF (per hand)
27
11
Actuator
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
Electric
Teleop
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Evidence
Evidence
MATRIX-3
Walker S2
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
No
No
Last reviewed
2026-07-20
2026-07-20
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published