Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
iCub leads on more comparable public fields than XPENG Iron. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
iCub leads on
- Lifecycle
- Reality Score
XPENG Iron leads on
- DoF (total)
Specs
Spec
iCub
XPENG Iron
Lifecycle
Limited release
Demo
Reality Score
70 / 100
40 / 100
Height
No sourceable public value for one side.
105 cm
No sourceable public value
Weight
No sourceable public value for one side.
33 kg
No sourceable public value
Payload
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Runtime
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Top speed
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
DoF (total)
53
82
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
No sourceable public value for one side.
Hybrid
No sourceable public value
Evidence
Evidence
iCub
XPENG Iron
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
Yes
No
Teleop disclosure
Yes
No
Last reviewed
2026-05-16
2026-05-20
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published