Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
NAO leads on more comparable public fields than Ameca. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
Ameca leads on
- DoF (total)
NAO leads on
- Reality Score
- Weight
Specs
Spec
Ameca
NAO
Lifecycle
Limited release
Limited release
Reality Score
57 / 100
75 / 100
Height
187 cm
57 cm
Weight
62 kg
5 kg
Payload
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Runtime
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
1h
Top speed
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
DoF (total)
61
25
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
Ameca
NAO
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-05-16
2026-05-16
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published