Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
vs
Quick read
iCub leads on more comparable public fields than Ameca. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
Ameca leads on
- DoF (total)
iCub leads on
- Reality Score
- Weight
Specs
Spec
Ameca
iCub
Lifecycle
Limited release
Limited release
Reality Score
57 / 100
70 / 100
Height
187 cm
105 cm
Weight
62 kg
33 kg
Payload
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Runtime
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Top speed
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
DoF (total)
61
53
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
Ameca
iCub
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
Yes
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-05-16
2026-05-16
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published