Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
NAO leads on more comparable public fields than AgiBot Expedition A3. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
AgiBot Expedition A3 leads on
- Runtime
NAO leads on
- Lifecycle
- Reality Score
- Weight
Specs
Spec
AgiBot Expedition A3
NAO
Lifecycle
Demo
Limited release
Reality Score
49 / 100
75 / 100
Height
173 cm
57 cm
Weight
55 kg
5 kg
Payload
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Runtime
10h
1h
Top speed
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
DoF (total)
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
25
DoF (per hand)
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Actuator
No sourceable public value for one side.
No sourceable public value
Electric
Teleop
Hybrid
Hybrid
Evidence
Evidence
AgiBot Expedition A3
NAO
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
Yes
Yes
Last reviewed
2026-05-19
2026-05-16
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published